AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Are Barack Hussein Obama and members of his administration operating with the mind-boggling incompetence of a proverbial North Korean fire drill? Or regarding foreign policy, do they know exactly what they're doing but are afraid to tell the American people the truth?
It's incredible but true ...
* The administration spends more time attempting to avoid labeling "radical Islamic terrorism" than fighting it.
* Obama seems much more willing to deal with the leaders of a rogue country like Iran than he is with members of Congress in his own country.
* The Paris attack on a kosher deli was regarded as a "random" act ... and 21 beheaded Coptic Christians were dubbed "Egyptian citizens" ... and Obama responded to those and other atrocities by calling a three-day conference, the most tangible outcome of which was State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf's suggestion that a way to fight Islamic terrorism is by creating jobs for them.
* The administration recently announced an attack to retake the Iraqi city of Mosul, including a timetable and the numbers of troops to be used. Such action could be considered borderline treason, but soon afterward, Pentagon officials admitted it wouldn't be able to train enough troops in time for such an offensive and that the Iraqi army wasn't up to the task.
* Obama has the U.S. "onlooking" as Iranian-trained Shia militia forces attempt to regain control over the strategic town of Tikrit, but even if the Iran-led force ousts ISIS from Tikrit and Mosul, there should be strong concerns about what will happen if the Iran/Shia forces control the Sunni-dominated city.
* Secretary of State John Kerry recently informed Americans that the world is safer today than at any time in the last 50 years, while on the same day, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that the reality and threat of terrorist violence is higher than he had seen in his 45-year career.
* Meanwhile, Obama appears hell-bent on achieving a deal with Iran that puts it within a year of developing a nuclear weapon and removes all impediments to do so in 10 years. But Iran's leaders, while "convincing" Obama that they don't have a nuclear weapons goal, continue building and testing intercontinental missiles that are useless without warheads to deliver.
Is there any way that a leadership "trade" could be made, with the U.S. receiving Benjamin Netanyahu in exchange for Barack Hussein Obama?
It's incredible but true ...
* The administration spends more time attempting to avoid labeling "radical Islamic terrorism" than fighting it.
* Obama seems much more willing to deal with the leaders of a rogue country like Iran than he is with members of Congress in his own country.
* The Paris attack on a kosher deli was regarded as a "random" act ... and 21 beheaded Coptic Christians were dubbed "Egyptian citizens" ... and Obama responded to those and other atrocities by calling a three-day conference, the most tangible outcome of which was State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf's suggestion that a way to fight Islamic terrorism is by creating jobs for them.
* The administration recently announced an attack to retake the Iraqi city of Mosul, including a timetable and the numbers of troops to be used. Such action could be considered borderline treason, but soon afterward, Pentagon officials admitted it wouldn't be able to train enough troops in time for such an offensive and that the Iraqi army wasn't up to the task.
* Obama has the U.S. "onlooking" as Iranian-trained Shia militia forces attempt to regain control over the strategic town of Tikrit, but even if the Iran-led force ousts ISIS from Tikrit and Mosul, there should be strong concerns about what will happen if the Iran/Shia forces control the Sunni-dominated city.
* Secretary of State John Kerry recently informed Americans that the world is safer today than at any time in the last 50 years, while on the same day, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified that the reality and threat of terrorist violence is higher than he had seen in his 45-year career.
* Meanwhile, Obama appears hell-bent on achieving a deal with Iran that puts it within a year of developing a nuclear weapon and removes all impediments to do so in 10 years. But Iran's leaders, while "convincing" Obama that they don't have a nuclear weapons goal, continue building and testing intercontinental missiles that are useless without warheads to deliver.
Is there any way that a leadership "trade" could be made, with the U.S. receiving Benjamin Netanyahu in exchange for Barack Hussein Obama?