AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
I'd like anyone to provide valid reasons why Hillary Clinton is more appealing as a presidential candidate than Carly Fiorina.
When listening to them speak, Fiorina is articulate, experienced and knowledgeable, while Clinton has limited experience and knowledge and only seems prone to articulate platitudes and liberal talking points.
Fiorina fields tough, unexpected questions, while on the other hand, CLINTON AVOIDS QUESTIONS.
Fiorina has been tested and successful in the real world of business, while Clinton has always been a member of the political class, coddled and protected by the media and the liberal elite.
HOWEVER, despite what logic dictates, and despite lack of trustworthiness, Clinton will almost certainly become the Democrats' nominee. And Fiorina will need to fight a field of at least 16 gentlemen to even be considered by the GOP.
The good-old-boy system is alive and well in the GOP, both in the top-echelon and the grass-roots level. But again, what is the rationale for Clinton being a premier candidate while Fiorina is not?
When listening to them speak, Fiorina is articulate, experienced and knowledgeable, while Clinton has limited experience and knowledge and only seems prone to articulate platitudes and liberal talking points.
Fiorina fields tough, unexpected questions, while on the other hand, CLINTON AVOIDS QUESTIONS.
Fiorina has been tested and successful in the real world of business, while Clinton has always been a member of the political class, coddled and protected by the media and the liberal elite.
HOWEVER, despite what logic dictates, and despite lack of trustworthiness, Clinton will almost certainly become the Democrats' nominee. And Fiorina will need to fight a field of at least 16 gentlemen to even be considered by the GOP.
The good-old-boy system is alive and well in the GOP, both in the top-echelon and the grass-roots level. But again, what is the rationale for Clinton being a premier candidate while Fiorina is not?