Anti Trumps vs. Anti Clintons

[9andaWiggle]

Vote for who you hate least. Sounds like a win for America! :facepalm:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-clinton-election-reutersipsos-poll/84015806/

 

[9andaWiggle]

If I had millions to burn, I'd fire up a big nationwide campaign mocking both parties with "Vote for the Worst" (shamelessly inspired by/copied from those who did it for Amer. Idol).

 

[MI2AZ]

Hasn't that already been the case the last few elections?

 

[AlwaysWrite]

Vote for who you hate least. Sounds like a win for America!

... but we have had similar "who you dislike least" choices lately: Bush vs. Gore, Bush vs. Kerry, Obama vs. McCain, Obama vs. Romney.

 

[AlwaysWrite]

Hasn't that already been the case the last few elections?

Sorry, MI2AZ. I made my previous post before I saw the above-quoted post. I apologize for the redundancy.

 

[MI2AZ]

Sorry, MI2AZ. I made my previous post before I saw your above-quoted post. I apologize for the redundancy.

Not necessary. Happened to me a couple of times too.

 

[9andaWiggle]

I guess that is true when you think about it... *sigh*

 

[MI2AZ]

I guess that is true when you think about it... *sigh*

Still does not say much good about the current party system or the politicians cycling through them.

 

[Djarum300]

... but we have had similar "who you dislike least" choices lately: Bush vs. Gore, Bush vs. Kerry, Obama vs. McCain, Obama vs. Romney.

I honestly liked some of Romney's and Mcains policies. Hilary is too liberal and I have no idea about Trump. The policy he's talked about in the past hasn't been susbstantial enough for me and he acts like an idiot at times.

 

[WAMO]

BUT ISNT IT WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET THERE, NOT WHAT THEY SAY TO GET THERE.

 

[AlwaysWrite]

BUT ISNT IT WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET THERE, NOT WHAT THEY SAY TO GET THERE.

EXAMPLE NO. 1: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA