Didn't know Trump was a medical expert or scientist. How many medical breakthroughs would any president be responsible for? I'm waiting...4 OUT OF THE 100BILLION TIMES THEY WERE RIGHT. NICE TRY G. AND NOT ONE OF THOSE HAD TO FOLLOW THE TOUGHER GUILDLINES WE NOW HAVE. HOW MANY GROUND BREAKING MEDICAL BREAKTHREWS HAS TRUMP BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR? WHAT? HOW MANY? ZERO!!!! THATS WHAT I THOUGHT.
Nope. A president needs to know who to surround himself with.EGGZACTLY! ZERO. PRESIDENTS NEED TO BE THE PRESIDENT AND KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT ABOUT MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC STUFF. ALL OF THEM, NOT JUST TRUMP. IM WAITING...
That's a good thing. He knows when he's made a mistake and remedies the situation. Better than leaving incompetence in the position.NOW YOUR YANKING MY CHAIN AGAIN! TRUMP HAS THE HIGHEST TURNOVER RATIO OF THE LAST 5 PRESIDENTS. YOUR KILLING ME G. STOP!
... and EVERYONE should be concerned about the extreme radicals and socialists that Biden would surround himself with, or rather, be surrounded by people who are forced on him by the extreme left.Nope. A president needs to know who to surround himself with.
Dear Greg T:That's a good thing. He knows when he's made a mistake and remedies the situation. Better than leaving incompetence in the position.
I see nothing wrong with a high turn-over for the first few years. A good businessman gets rid of those who do not perform to expectations.Dear Greg T:
I was just going to say the same thing (before I read your post).
Dear Greg T:I see nothing wrong with a high turn-over for the first few years. A good businessman gets rid of those who do not perform to expectations.
Yup. Got plenty of examples, there!!!!Dear Greg T:
Also keep in mind that in general -- not ALWAYS, but in general -- if a Republican politician is guilty of wrongdoing or substantial misconduct, they are voted out of office (if not removed), but if a Democrat is guilty of something equivalent, the party stands behind the alleged offender and especially in solid Democrat-controlled areas, the politician remains in office.
But Trump resorting to science will never happenIf Trump makes any "scientific" claim(s), it's likely that WAMO will oppose such claim(s).
Science with an R or a D?But Trump resorting to science will never happen
Exactly. And I've been seeing data from the African countries where they are just as infected, according to antibodies, but have shown no major death rate and very few symptoms. They've had no lock downs, no major distancing, and they just go about their business. I believe it is because they have access to Hydroxychloroquine OTC down there as a malaria treatment. Everyone takes the stuff, they get the virus and don't even know it. Of course, the U.S. has to go completely APE SHIT on every fucking thing and cause mass hysteria. It's the liberal way.Science with an R or a D?
There is a shit ton of science across the world that pretty much says the lockdowns aren't working at all. But that doesn't fit with the D narrative.
Spot on. A good leader will posess the keen ability to identify people who have the necessary traits, experience, and attitude to excel at the job. A good leader will then be able to quickly understand how to work with and extract from that person their best work. Hiring talent then firing them shortly after calls into question the leaders ability to either gauge talent, or positively motivate their team, or both. Every leader makes the occasional mistake and has to cut their losses, but when there's a repeated pattern of failure, what is the root of the problem?HIGH RATE OF EMPLOYEE TURNOVER JUST MEANS HE IS A HORRIBLE JUDGE OF PEOPLE, OR HE IS HIGHERING PEOPLE HE CANT CONTROL. A NORMAL BUSINESS WITH THAT MUCH TURNOVER DOESNT LAST LONG AT ALL. IN THE NORMAL WORLD, SHAREHOLDERS WOULDNT STAND FOR THAT MUCH HIGHERING AND FIREING. THEY WOULD REPLACE THE CEO, AS VOTERS SHOULD DO NOW.
I agree, to a point. But when a president is elected he has very little time to build a cabinet and must go on little information and other's recommendations. Sometimes those recommendations are iffy, and past performance is that of other peoples' opinions. It's a start. Tweaking takes place during the few couple of years. Those who build a cabinet quickly and then let those people have free reign end up like Bam Bam. Nothing but crooked scandal and corruption.Spot on. A good leader will posess the keen ability to identify people who have the necessary traits, experience, and attitude to excel at the job. A good leader will then be able to quickly understand how to work with and extract from that person their best work. Hiring talent then firing them shortly after calls into question the leaders ability to either gauge talent, or positively motivate their team, or both. Every leader makes the occasional mistake and has to cut their losses, but when there's a repeated pattern of failure, what is the root of the problem?
... and the fake-news lamestream media way!It's the liberal way.