D Djarum300 Addicted Member Jul 25, 2023 #1 To wikipedia when they constantly allow othera to lie about events and people?
Greg T. The Jizz Slinger Staff member Jul 26, 2023 #2 Djarum300 said: To wikipedia when they constantly allow othera to lie about events and people? Click to expand... Good point. It's never been a good source for truth.
Djarum300 said: To wikipedia when they constantly allow othera to lie about events and people? Click to expand... Good point. It's never been a good source for truth.
D Djarum300 Addicted Member Jul 26, 2023 #3 I just find it funny every year they say they can't be naughty when we know they are.
AlwaysWrite Addicted Member Jul 27, 2023 #4 Wikipedia is more reliable than the fake-news lamestream media, but of course, that's not saying much!
Wikipedia is more reliable than the fake-news lamestream media, but of course, that's not saying much!
D Djarum300 Addicted Member Jul 27, 2023 #5 AlwaysWrite said: Wikipedia is more reliable than the fake-news lamestream media, but of course, that's not saying much! Click to expand... There are famous people and podcasters who aren't even allowed to change their own page to remove stuff that never happened or that is libel in nature. Wiki gets away with libel because of section 230 even though every article says "from wikipedia".
AlwaysWrite said: Wikipedia is more reliable than the fake-news lamestream media, but of course, that's not saying much! Click to expand... There are famous people and podcasters who aren't even allowed to change their own page to remove stuff that never happened or that is libel in nature. Wiki gets away with libel because of section 230 even though every article says "from wikipedia".