Trump guilty

[Djarum300]

Of course after the judge pretty much instructed them to find him guilty.

What a scham

 

[REVerse °]

The whole thing was a circus show. The judge was not even on the list of certified judges.

 

[Greg T.]

The guilty verdict was already planned before the trial. The trial was just another covid.

 

[Djarum300]

Man, dragging this up. I forgot about this:

x.com

x.com

So did Clinton file this as a campaign finance expense?

 

[AlwaysWrite]

In Manhattan, about 9 in 10 people are Democrats, and most of the other 10% would never admit they're not, at least around their peers.

You mean that out of 12 jurors -- with two attorneys among them -- there wasn't one who could see through the scam? And perhaps there were one or two potential holdouts (in support of the law and lack of viable evidence) but they would likely fold under pressure and agree to the unanimous verdict.

There are so many improper aspects of the sham proceedings that the convictions will be overturned on appeal, but the way the appeals system normally operates, it may be 2026 before the verdict is nullified.

It isn't normal, but in a situation like this, the Supreme Court should receive (and agree to accept) an appeal case on an emergency basis.

 

[Greg T.]

This verdict was predetermined before the trial began. No way 12 people will come to unanimous agreement on all 34 counts. No way, with the shit evidence and obvious bias by the judge.

 

[AlwaysWrite]

[My full comments are stated in a self-penned editorial posted earlier in this forum]

 

[Greg T.]

 

[AlwaysWrite]

Clarence Thomas is a brilliant man, and I agree with his thought processes.