AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Despite continued denials by Hillary Rodham Clinton that she did nothing improper regarding her e-mails, Judge Jeanine presents the true FACTS of the situation ...
Dear WAMO:WELL...ATLEAST "IF" SHE WINS THE ELECTION, EVERYBODY KNOWS SHE IS A LIAR UP FRONT AND NOT FIND OUT AFTER SHE IS IN OFFICE LIKE ALL THE OTHERS.
... and if so, that will once again affirm my contention that the American voters are STUPID!I don't like her one bit. But she seems to be teflon coated just like our current POTUS, and I will be shocked if she's not the next Pres.
I seldom listen to the words that come out of her OVAL mouth...I like to turn the sound down and just look at her...what a woman...Despite continued denials by Hillary Rodham Clinton that she did nothing improper regarding her e-mails, Judge Jeanine presents the true FACTS of the situation ...
Dear bbfreeburn:Just a minor point. Facts are neither for nor against someone. They are soulless. They may implicate someone, justify a position, or limit an argument, but they are at all times subject to the use of humans.
Dear bbfreeburn:Had deflection been my intent my post would have appeared first in this topic, just as soon as you posted it. I merely wish to correct your use of language. As someone once said, "English is a fine language. We should all learn to speak it."
Dear bbfreeburn:Just a minor point. Facts are neither for nor against someone. They are soulless. They may implicate someone, justify a position, or limit an argument, but they are at all times subject to the use of humans.
... and it's a FACT that you are choosing to ignore the FACTS (as presented by Judge Jeanine) while attempting to put the focus on ME. However, that's your option, and thanks for thinking about me. It's much appreciated.Fact, in and of themselves, are nothing. Facts may be used, however, to make a case, to refute a case, to make a claim, to refute a claim or anything else that a presenter of fact may wish.
Dear Robadat:Facts being as they may be cited by the Judge, there is a strong case that Hillary should be criminally charged in this case. However, whether or not that happens is entirely dependent on if the DoJ decides to prosecute her. While I believe she certainly should be charged with the crimes Judge Jeanine Pirro has laid out, I'll not be holding my breath waiting for her to be formally charged by the DoJ.