AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
How can anyone believe much of the anti-Trump propaganda that is continually disseminated by the lamestream media? Now, we're seeing all sorts of headlines that read something like ...
GOP in damage control over health care price tag
If you immerse yourself in lamestream media coverage, you might think that the Trump administration is on the verge of total collapse, but they have been WRONG, WRONG, WRONG about Trump from the get-go.
For weeks and months, the media said that Hillary had a 95 percent chance of winning, and there was all sorts of stories about how it would be impossible for Trump to "run the table" in the key swing states. And there were many stories about how Hillary could (or would) be able to bring such red states as Texas, Georgia, Utah and Arizona into her column.
Journalists are increasingly lumping themselves into a single liberal mindset, paying more attention to -- and falling in line with -- the liberal consensus of their peers.
They are telling all sorts of negatives about Trump's repeal-and-replace plan, BUT WHAT DID THEY TELL YOU ABOUT OBAMACARE? Did they harp on the fact that in many cases, people couldn't keep their plan or their doctors? And did they tell about how the premiums and deductibles would increase big-time?
Of course, there's the possibility that they didn't have any idea about what Obamacare would REALLY bring? And that leads to the question: How can anyone figure that they will be anywhere near correct about Trump's health plan?
GOP in damage control over health care price tag
If you immerse yourself in lamestream media coverage, you might think that the Trump administration is on the verge of total collapse, but they have been WRONG, WRONG, WRONG about Trump from the get-go.
For weeks and months, the media said that Hillary had a 95 percent chance of winning, and there was all sorts of stories about how it would be impossible for Trump to "run the table" in the key swing states. And there were many stories about how Hillary could (or would) be able to bring such red states as Texas, Georgia, Utah and Arizona into her column.
Journalists are increasingly lumping themselves into a single liberal mindset, paying more attention to -- and falling in line with -- the liberal consensus of their peers.
They are telling all sorts of negatives about Trump's repeal-and-replace plan, BUT WHAT DID THEY TELL YOU ABOUT OBAMACARE? Did they harp on the fact that in many cases, people couldn't keep their plan or their doctors? And did they tell about how the premiums and deductibles would increase big-time?
Of course, there's the possibility that they didn't have any idea about what Obamacare would REALLY bring? And that leads to the question: How can anyone figure that they will be anywhere near correct about Trump's health plan?
